Grenfell Tower fire: May under pressure after ‘angry exchanges’

Eve Allison, a Conservative who sits on Kensington and Chelsea Borough Council, said the refurbishment of Grenfell Tower should have looked at the inside as well as the outside of the block.

“It is on our watch, it’s our responsibility, we do have a duty of care to all our residents and whatever findings and failings come out, they have to come out soon because all the community, the victims, the families, people need answers,” she told BBC Breakfast.

“All too often we’re a little bit too concerned with how the immediate streetscape looks, how a building fits into other buildings, does it detract from the immediate streetscape.”

“I was not involved with the actual planning of the recent refurbishment….from what I’m hearing, it would have been ideal if part of the refurbishment package had looked at actually trying to gentrify inside, not just outside.

The Home Office is assisting the family of Mohammed Alhajali, the 23-year-old Syrian refugee who was the first fatality of the disaster to be formally identified by police, to travel to the UK to attend his funeral.

More than 85,000 people have signed a petition calling for his parents to be granted visas.

We have made contact with Mr Alhajali’s family yesterday and assisted them in making arrangement for their travel to the UK in these terribly sad circumstances.”

The petition was set up by a family friend, Mirna Suleiman, 26. His older brother, Omar, who was with him in the flat, survived the fire after they were separated on their way out.
Residents affected by the Grenfell Tower atrocity were passionate and angry during a lengthy exchange with the prime minister, according to a bishop who sat with them.

Sixteen “very ordinary people” sat in Downing Street on Saturday to bring their concerns to Theresa May in an “unprecedented” meeting and finally felt they were listened to, said the bishop of Kensington, Dr Graham Tomlin.

He is hopeful the meeting which lasted nearly two hours, attended by victims, residents, community leaders and volunteers, was the starting point for a process of “lasting change”.

He told the Press Association: “I’m positive because I think it was a real chance for local residents, people affected by this tragedy, to voice their concerns directly to the prime minister so that she could hear them. That’s why I’m positive about it, because I think in the past local residents here have not always been listened to.”

READ  NEWS/ Brexit, amalgamation and British hypocrisy

He said that feeling of being ignored is a source of much “deep frustration”, and told how people have been left feeling “that decisions are taken about their lives and their homes that they are not party to”.

He described the residents as “brilliant” in how they raised and explained their concerns to May: “I thought the way they expressed themselves with a mixture of passion and reason was fantastic, and I hope it’s the beginning of a process, not the end of a process, the beginning of a process of real listening between government, RBKC [the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea council], local residents, that will bring about lasting change.”

Following the meeting, May released a strongly-worded statement in which she said on-the-ground support for families in the immediate aftermath of the blaze “was not good enough”.

She said she had ordered daily progress reports on housing for those affected, and vowed the public inquiry into the disaster would be “open and transparent”. Tomlin said the residents had gone from living normal lives before the tragedy to bringing their frustrations to the very top of government.

He said: “Clearly it’s quite unprecedented for 16 very ordinary people, who this time last week were walking their dogs or talking to each other in the streets around here and north Kensington, actually to be in 10 Downing Street talking face-to-face with the prime minister. I think it was a good thing to do.”

Asked if there were angry exchanges, he said: “We tried to hold it well as a meeting. There was passion, there was anger, but there was good, hard, reasoned argument used by the residents.”

Tomlin said he believed residents left the meeting feeling “reassured that they were listened to”, but added: “Time will tell as to whether it makes a difference. We wait to see what action will come from it, but they were reassured that they were listened to.

LEAVE A REPLY